Santa Rosa DUI Checkpoints

DUI Checkpoints in sonoma county

It is the opinion of Wilber Law Offices that DUI checkpoints are, in fact, often used for other purposes. Considering the amount of DUI arrests resulting from these constitutional infringements, (not many) they are more a checkpoint for any violation, and less about DUI investigations and screening.

Typically law enforcement must have probable cause to stop you. That is, they must believe there is a likelihood that the law is being broken. This can include a Vehicle Code violation, vehicle safety defects, or poor driving. So, how is it that law enforcement can just stop you at these checkpoints without observing any of the mentioned criteria?

In Order to Survive Any Constitutional Scrutiny, the Law Enforcement Agency “hosting” the Checkpoint Must Fulfill or Abide by the Following Criteria:

  1. supervising officers must make all operational decisions;
  2. the criteria for stopping motorists must be neutral;
  3. the checkpoint must be reasonably located;
  4. adequate safety precautions must be taken;
  5. the checkpoint’s time and duration should reflect “good judgment”;
  6. the checkpoint must exhibit sufficient indicia of its official nature;
  7. drivers should be detained a minimal amount of time; and
  8. roadblocks should be publicly advertised in advance.

(Ingersoll v. Palmer (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1321, 743 P.2d 1299)

If any of the above requirements are absent from law enforcement’s checkpoint, it could present a defense to your DUI matter. The likelihood of winning on this basis is low, but not impossible. Wilber Law Offices enjoys these challenges and will always explore every avenue of defense available to you.

Case Dismissed
But case later overturned on appeal based on arguments made by our counsel during the trial that the blood test was inadmissible and that there was no time of driving established by the evidence.
  • Case Dismissed
    Case dismissed on eve of trial.
  • Case Dismissed
    Case dismissed after filing, and before hearing on a motion to suppress evidence.
  • Favorable Outcome
    Client accused of possession of narcotics for sale was convicted at jury trial – Prior to trial, the only offer extended to client was straight prison time. After trial, successfully argued to the court that client should be granted probation with the opportunity to go to ...
  • “If you need legal help I fully recommend them! If your looking for an experienced trial lawyer this is the team you want to hire.” - William H.
  • “One of the best experiences in my life. Professional, courteous and understanding through whole process.” - Scott J.
  • “I’ve known Ryan for the better part of 20 years, he is very passionate about his work and it shows!” - Beau K.

Contact Our Firm

Schedule Your Consultation Today

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.